Wonderful detective
Billy Wilder is among definitely the directors with the past. An exceptional feature of his films is that it isn't slightly outdated even today. He made great comedies, great noir films and detective stories. It would be to ppos that the'Witness to the Prosecution'of 1957 belongs. I watched exceptional detective movie Witness to the Prosecution (1957) on #link# free online in HD.


The plot requires the way it is of Leonardo Vole, that is accused of murdering an elderly lady for profit. A sick lawyer Wilfrid Robarts, played by way of the inimitable Charles Lawton, decides to conserve the child, believing as part of his innocence. blog about movies However, all his plans collapse when Leonardo's wife Christina (Marlene Dietrich) appears while in the courtroom ... However, further everything will probably be difficult and interesting.

Probably, including the most ingenious viewer will be unable to predict how this story will finish, who'll be really guilty ... The film constantly affords the viewer new and new details from the plot and keeps them in suspense until the very end.

Separately, I'd like to note the acting performance of Marlene Dietrich. For me, she was and remains essentially the most outstanding actresses inside good reputation for Cinema. She starred in'Witnesses to the Prosecution'already in a venerable age, so she used not her beauty, but exclusively the artist's talent. And Marlene coped with her role perfectly.


Summing up, we can easily safely claim that'The Witness from the Prosecution'is among the best detectives from the joy of Cinema and easily an excellent film from an awesome director.

Films that have obtained the approval of everyone as “classic cinema” in the decades unfavorable reactions their own personal special atmosphere and, usually, develop themes which were, are and relevant. read movies reviews This is actually the film adaptation of among the list of pages from the immortal creativity of Agatha Christie, for almost half a century it has developed into frequenter of a number of ratings and tops, especially in combination with the subgenre of legal drama. Although inside 1950s color cinema wasn't longer something outlandish, "Witness for the Prosecution" is remembered largely as a result of traditional black and white palette, or rather one shade.

What made Witness with the Prosecution quite popular and expressive. In reality, a full combination of factors, including original literary, cast, socially relevant topic. While the sensation on the magic of cinema doesn't arise, and yes it can not work in the market to call the film exciting, it really, up to a point, absorbs for two hours of viewing. The viewers spoiled by modern cinema can easily overlook, resulting from prejudices, contrived moral obsolescence. In fact, The Witness for that Prosecution laid down plenty of those elements we still see essential dramas and detective stories, which are based on a semblance connected with an intellectual challenge. During viewing, every so often at my head associations as to what I have come across, not surprisingly, in favor of the 1957 film.

When it comes to plot itself, from the height with the items had been seen within the genre (I confess, just about a goal argument), there is absolutely no all-consuming intrigue that is going to pour a chilly shower of bright emotions. We will spend a great part your in time a depressing and gloomy courtroom, in which the jury will decide the fate in the charged with murdering an elderly widow. Interestingly, the twelve jurors are shown an exclusively secondary role here, and the viewer's attention is drawn precisely to the opposition between Defense and Accusation. For my family, the brightest performer hasn't been Marlene Dietrich, whose benefit performance is actually difficult to never notice, and also her appearance at a decent age for a woman over 50. I was simply subdued by way of the picture of an intolerant and rude, but incredibly professional lawyer done by Charles Lawton.